|
Technical advances during the last decade
have enabled researchers to modify at will the properties of
many naturally occurring enzymes. These approaches have also
facilitated the generation of stabilised enzymes with increased
turnover numbers and altered substrate- and stereo-selectivities
to be used in industrial processes. Up to now, the most
impressive results in enzyme design have been obtained by
directed evolution. In this two-step approach random mutagenesis
is used to create large enzyme repertoires, from which optimised
variants are then isolated using either selection or screening
techniques. In contrast to directed evolution, the alternative
approach of rational enzyme design requires a detailed knowledge
of a specific enzyme structure and catalytic mechanism. Although
occasionally successful, rational design approaches often fail,
due to a limited understanding of the subtle interplay among
amino acid side chains within an enzyme active site. Recent
results suggest that this bottleneck toward the acquisition of
tailored enzymes can be overcome by applying sophisticated
computational methods.
We have used directed evolution to establish
the activity of phosphoriboslyanthranilate isomerase (TrpF) on
the natural (ba)8-barrel
scaffolds of ProFAR isomerase (HisA) and imidazoleglycerol
phosphate synthase (HisF). Since only few mutations were
necessary for the activity switch, our results suggest that
TrpF, HisA and HisF have evolved from a common ancestor by a
series of gene duplication and fusion events.
Moreover, we have used random mutagenesis and
selection in vivo to increase the low catalytic activity of a
thermostable dimeric anthranilate phosphoribosyl transferase at
room temperature. The turnover number of the best mutant was
increased 40-fold compared to the wild-type enzyme, due to an
increased product release rate. Moreover, we have used rational
design to generate a fully active monomeric variant of this
enzyme by replacing hydrophobic residues at the protein
interface with negatively charged ones.
|
|
|
|
Enzyme engineering by directed evolution |
|