Prof. Dr Henning Ernst Müller

Henning Ernst Müller, born in Leverkusen in 1961, is married with two children. He attended the Carl-Duisberg Gymnasium in Leverkusen until he took his Abitur in 1981. After completing his alternative civilian service, he studied law at the Free University of Berlin from 1983 to 1988 and subsequently worked as a research assistant in the department headed by Prof. Dr Ulrich Eisenberg. From 1991 to 1994, he was a trainee lawyer in the district of the Kammergericht. In 1992, Henning Ernst Müller obtained his doctorate from the Free University of Berlin with a thesis entitled “Official Secrecy and the Defendant’s Plea of Exculpation” (published by Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 1992).

After passing his second state law examination, he was a research assistant at the chair of Prof. Dr Ulrich Eisenberg. In the summer of 1999, he obtained his habilitation at the Free University with the monograph “False Testimony and the Doctrine of Complicity” (published by Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2000). He was granted the venia legendi to teach criminal law, criminal procedure, criminology, juvenile criminal law and the prison system.
Following a period as acting chair, Henning Ernst Müller was appointed in July 2000 as the successor to Prof. Dr Klaus Rolinski to the Chair of Criminal Law, Criminology, Juvenile Criminal Law and the Prison System at the University of Regensburg and was appointed university professor.
From 2004 to 2006, Henning Ernst Müller served as Dean of the Faculty of Law.

• Commentary on

  Sections 105–109k of the German Criminal Code (Offences against constitutional bodies, in connection with elections and referendums, and offences against national defence), Before Section 153, Sections 153–163 of the German Criminal Code (Offences relating to testimony)

  in: Erb, Schäfer (eds.): Munich Commentary on the Criminal Code. Vol. 3
  Sections 80–184k, 5th ed., Munich, 2025.

• Advanced examination paper ‘Good advice doesn’t have to cost a fortune’, in: Juristische Ausbildung (JURA) 2023, 1335–1344.
  in collaboration with Yusef Mansouri

• On the decriminalisation of shoplifting

  in: Camilla Bertheau, Werner Beulke, Matthias Jahn, Anke Müller-Jacobsen, Charlotte Schmitt-Leonardy [eds.]: Criminal Law and Criminal Defence in History, Practice and Politics, Festschrift for Alexander Ignor on his 70th birthday, Heidelberg 2023, pp. 329–336.

• Commentary on

• Section 184k (Invasion of privacy through photographic images), Sections 201–201a of the German Criminal Code (StGB) (Violation of the confidentiality of speech, the most private sphere of life and personal rights through photographic images), Sections 106 (Unauthorised use of copyright-protected works), 108–108b (unauthorised infringement of related rights, commercial unauthorised use), Sections 109–111 of the German Copyright Act (UrhG) (criminal complaint, confiscation, publication of the conviction)

  in: Schumann, Mosbacher, König [eds.]: Nomos Commentary on Media Criminal Law, Baden-Baden. 2023.

• The ‘BAMF scandal’ – criminal prosecution caught between politics and the media

  in: Strafverteidiger Spezial 2/2021, pp. 71–76.

• Commentary on

  Sections 105–109k of the German Criminal Code (StGB) (Offences against constitutional bodies, as well as during elections and referendums, and offences against national defence), Before Section 153, Sections 153–163 of the German Criminal Code (StGB) (Offences relating to testimony)

  in: Erb, Schäfer (eds.): Munich Commentary on the Criminal Code. Vol. 3
  §§ 80–184k, 4th ed., Munich, 2021.

• The Crime Victim in Criminology and Criminal Procedure

  in: Victims. Dynamics of Victimisation from the 17th to the 21st Century, Harriet Rudolph (ed.), Isabella von Treskow (ed.), Heidelberg 2020, pp. 283 ff. together with Annemarie Schmoll

• Violence as a Topic in Criminology

  in: Christiane Thim-Mabrey, Matthias Brack, Alexander Fink (eds.): VII Regensburg Symposium ‘Man in Time – Time in Man’. ‘Future – Past – Now’ as understood by science; 8th Regensburg Symposium on Causality: The Question of ‘How, Why and What For’ in Science and Society. Case Study: Propensity for Violence – Combating Violence, Regensburg 2020, pp.177–195.

• Research into the severity of offences as the basis for a just criminal justice system?

  in: Johannes Kaspar, Tonio Walter (eds.): Punishments ‘in the Name of the People’?, Baden-Baden 2019, pp. 117–130.
  in collaboration with Annemarie Schmoll

• What is the purpose of punishment? More than just retribution

  in: Legal Tribune Online, 28 September 2019. The publication is available online.

• Is it permissible to lie in mediation?

  In: *Die Mediation* 2019 (3), pp. 71–73.

• Commentary on

  Sections 17 (Offences against constitutional bodies and in connection with elections and referendums), 18 (Offences relating to the protection of national defence) and 21 of the German Criminal Code (StGB) (False statements without oath and perjury)

  in: Hilgendorf, Kudlich, Valerius (eds.): Handbook of Criminal Law. Vol. 4, 1st ed., Heidelberg, 2019.

• ‘Moneyball’ in criminal law practice

  in: Ingke Goeckenjan, Jens Puschke, Tobias Singelnstein (eds.):
  For the Cause – Criminology from an Independent Perspective, Festschrift for Ulrich Eisenberg on his 80th birthday, Berlin 2019, pp. 97–108.

• The Love Parade trial: merely “minor culpability” and “no public interest”?

  in: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (Einspruch magazine) dated 13 January 2019.

• Commentary on Federal Court of Justice (BGH), decision of 28 August 2018 – 5 StR 50/17: Requirements for the presentation of evidence in standardised biostatistical probability calculations

  in: JR 2019 (1), pp. 43–50. The publication is available online.
  together with U. Eisenberg

• Sentencing: In the darkroom. Commentary on the G20 judgement of the Hamburg Local Court.

  in: Legal Tribune Online, 1 September 2017. The publication is available online.

• Statement on the draft bill concerning ‘illegal motor racing’.
  The publication is available online.
• Statement on the legislative proposal “Act Amending the Criminal Code – Strengthening the Protection of Law Enforcement Officers and Emergency Services Personnel” (BT-Drs. 18/11161) and on the recommendations of the Legal Affairs Committee and the Committee on Internal
  Affairs of the Bundesrat (BR-Drs. 126/1/17). The publication is available online.

• Commentary on the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) judgement of 22 June 2016 – 5 StR 524/15 (Particular gravity of guilt in the case of a young person)

  in: JR 2017(3), pp. 118–122.

• Commentary on

  Sections 105–109k of the German Criminal Code (StGB) (Offences against constitutional bodies, as well as during elections and referendums, and offences against national defence), Sections 153–162 of the German Criminal Code (StGB) (Offences relating to testimony)

  in: Joecks, Miebach (eds.): Munich Commentary on the Criminal Code. Vol. 3
  §§ 80–184j, 3rd ed., Munich, 2017.

• Expert report on the options under immigration law and criminal procedure in the case of Anis AMRI, commissioned by the FDP parliamentary group in the State Parliament of North Rhine-Westphalia.
  Regensburg/Düsseldorf, 20 January 2017.

• Ministry of Justice presents draft bill. Electronic tagging for extremists

  in: Legal Tribune Online, 6 January 2017. The publication online.

• Practical commentary on the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) judgement of 24 March 2016 – 2 StR 112/14 (judgement requirements regarding DNA evidence)

  in: Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 8/2016, pp. 494–496.
  together with Prof. Dr Ulrich Eisenberg

• Good intentions, hasty proceedings, problematic outcome

  in: Editorial NJW-Aktuell Issue 31/2016, p. 3.

• Why it is right not to show attackers Interview with: WDR Aktuelle Stunde, 27 July 2016. The interview online.

• Review of Quent, Matthias: Racism, Radicalisation, Right-wing Terrorism. How the NSU came into being and what it reveals about society.

  in: Monthly Journal of Criminology and Criminal Law Reform 3/16, pp. 249–250.

• What’s next in the Böhmermann case?

  in: Legal Tribune Online, 18 April 2016. The publication is available online.

• Truth, Delusion and Arbitrariness. Review of Max Steller’s *Nothing but the Truth?*

  In: Legal Tribune Online, 17 October 2015. The publication is available online.

• Satire, religion and public order – on the controversy surrounding Section 166 of the German Criminal Code

  In: Martin H. W. Möllers, Robert Chr. van Ooyen (eds.): Yearbook of Public Security 2014/2015, Frankfurt 2015, pp. 333–339.
  in collaboration with Claudia Pfeffer

• Why do people commit acts of violence? Multi- and interdisciplinary explanations of violence

  in: Blick in die Wissenschaft 31, 2015, pp. 3–7.

• Special issue on ‘Violence’, *Blick in die Wissenschaft* 31 – Research Magazine of the University of Regensburg
• Edited jointly with Inga Neumann and Isabella von Treskow, Regensburg 2015.

• “Acting on behalf of or on the instructions of” – Remarks on the genesis of Section 108e of the German Criminal Code (StGB)

  in: Jan Bockemühl, Katrin Gierhake, Henning Ernst Müller, Tonio Walter (eds.): Festschrift for Bernd von Heintschel-Heinegg, Munich 2015, pp. 325–336.

• Festschrift for Bernd von Heintschel-Heinegg on his 70th birthday. Edited jointly with Jan Bockemühl, Katrin Gierhake and Tonio Walter, Munich 2015.

• ‘A Dishonest Borrower’

  in: Juristische Arbeitsblätter 2015, pp. 511–519.
  in collaboration with Annemarie Schmoll

• Comments on the school massacre from a criminological perspective

  in: Ralf Junkerjürgen, Isabella von Treskow (eds.): Amok and School Massacres. Approaches from Cultural and Media Studies, Bielefeld 2015, pp. 51–68.

• Psychiatric abnormalities and ‘gang’ membership

  in: Christian Fahl, Eckhart Müller, Helmut Satzger, Sabine Swoboda (eds.): Festschrift for Werner Beulke on his 70th birthday, Heidelberg 2015, pp. 1195–1204.

• Of course, not a neutral book. Review of Gerhard Strate’s *The Mollath Case*

  in: Legal Tribune Online, 12 December 2014. The publication is available online.

• The Edathy Case – The Public Prosecution Service in a “grey area”

  in: Heise online, 21 February 2014. The publication online.

• On the Renaissance of Retribution

  Ring publication project “Prevention and Attribution – Prevention-Oriented Attribution?” (Part 3), in: Strafverteidiger 2014, pp. 370–377.
  in collaboration with Dr Gabriele Klocke

• Lead – Approaches to an Ecological Criminology

  in: Frank Neubacher, Michael Kubink (eds.): Criminology – Juvenile Criminal Law – Prison System. A commemorative volume for Michael Walter, Berlin 2014, pp. 127–140.

• Perjury as Fraud or Defamation. Testimonial Offences in Feuerbach’s Criminal Code

  in: Arnd Koch, Michael Kubiciel, Martin Löhnig, Michael Pawlik (eds.): Feuerbach’s Bavarian Criminal Code. The Birth of Liberal, Modern and Rational Criminal Law, Tübingen 2014, pp. 373–384.
  together with Edda Pauli

• The Mollath Case: A Case for Legal Scholarship?

  in: Sascha Pommrenke, Marcus B. Klöckner (eds.): State Failure at the Highest Level. What Must Change Following the Mollath Case, Frankfurt am Main 2013, pp. 92–101.

• ‘A Summer’s Evening’

  in: Juristische Arbeitsblätter 2013, pp. 756–765.
  together with Annemarie Schmoll

• The Mollath Case: An Outrageous Interference

  Editorial in: *Strafverteidiger* 2/2013, p. I.

• The ’68ers and the Judiciary

  In: Martin Löhnig, Mareike Preisner, Thomas Schlemmer (eds.): Reform and Revolt. A Legal History of the 1960s and 1970s, Tübingen 2012,
  pp. 279–295.

• Is copying a criminal offence? Academic plagiarism from a criminal law perspective

  in: A Glimpse into Academia. Research Magazine of the University of Regensburg, Issue 26, 2012, pp. 22–27.

• The ‘Supreme Court-approved’ quality seal. The Mollath case on the verge of a retrial

  in: Legal Tribune Online, 6 December 2012. The publication is available online

• An acquittal challenges the Bundestag – remarks on the debate surrounding circumcision

  Editorial in: Juristische Arbeitsblätter 10/2012, p. I.

• No platform for glory-seeking assassins

  in: Legal Tribune Online, 30 July 2012. The publication online.

• Commentary on the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) judgement of 17 March 2011 – 1 StR 407/10 (falsification of election documents)

  in: NStZ 2012, pp. 147–150.

• Commentary on

  Sections 105–109k of the German Criminal Code (Offences against constitutional bodies and in connection with elections and referendums, and offences against national defence), Sections 153–162 of the German Criminal Code (Offences relating to testimony)

  in: Joecks, Miebach (eds.): Munich Commentary on the Criminal Code. Vol. 3
  Sections 80–184g, 2nd ed., Munich, 2012.

• Traffic offences. Frequency • Consequences • Sanctions • Prevention. Berlin 2011. In collaboration with H. Hautzinger, G. Manssen, B. Schlag, M. Pfeiffer, L. Rößger, J. Schade, P. Butterwegge and T. Gehlert . The publication is available online.

• ‘Superficially charming’, but potentially dangerous? Robert Hare’s Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R)

  in: NStZ 2011, pp. 665–671.

• Systemic justice and acceptance of norms in criminal road traffic law, with particular reference to speeding,

  in: Claudius Geisler, Erik Kraatz, Joachim Kretschmer, Hartmut Schneider, Christoph Sowada (eds.) Festschrift for Klaus Geppert on his 70th birthday on 11 March 2011, Berlin/New York 2011, pp. 405–421.

• Labelling ‘repeat offenders’? The development of a criminological theoretical approach and its relevance today

  in: Criminal Defence Lawyers’ Associations (eds.) Woe betide the accused.... 34th Criminal Defence Lawyers’ Conference in Hamburg, Berlin 2011, pp. 169–189. The publication online

• Commentary on the Hamburg Higher Regional Court, judgement of 15 February 2010 – 2 –2715.February 2010 – 2 – 27/09 REV (Intentional ‘possession’ of child pornography files on the internet even without deliberate storage on the hard drive)

  in: Multimedia and Law 2010, pp. 344–345.

• Preventive detention, the Basic Law and the European Convention on Human Rights

  in: Criminal Defence Lawyer 2010, pp. 207–212.

• A question of law and one of morality (on the tax data CD)

  www.blog.beck.de,30.1.2010

• Does Germany need an independent investigative body to deal with allegations of police misconduct, as in England and Wales?

  www.blog.beck.de,8.1.2010

• Retrospective extension of preventive detention is a violation of human rights – Germany condemned in Strasbourg

  www.blog.beck.de, 17 December 2009

• Violence against police officers – major criminological research project under fire

  www.blog.beck.de, 17 December 2009

• The Tennessee Eisenberg case – new insights from a reconstruction of the crime?

  www.blog.beck.de, 5 December 2009

• With 11 September, the (mis)application of criminal law against the enemy will also be put on trial

  www.blog.beck.de, 15 November 2009

• The Kassandra case – consequences of the investigating authorities’ questionable information policy

  www.blog.beck.de, 27 October 2009

• Preventing school massacres – should reporting be restricted by law?

  in: NJW-aktuell, Issue 43/2009, pp. XII–XIII.

• Are you familiar with the Virtual Specialised Library on Law?

  www.blog.beck.de, 30 September 2009

• Following the attack on the school in Ansbach – it is time to restrict media coverage

  www.blog.beck.de, 25 September 2009

• On violence on German streets – flawed BKA crime statistics are influencing the political debate

  www.blog.beck.de, 20 September 2009

• Doctors who accept bribes from pharmaceutical companies: a criminal offence of bribery or ‘perfectly normal, natural behaviour’?

  www.blog.beck.de, 17 September 2009

• Prison scandal in Saxony – is the residential group detention system to blame?

  www.blog.beck.de, 8 July 2009

• The 2008 Police Crime Statistics – and every year it’s the same old story

  www.blog.beck.de, 16 June 2009

• State control and societal reaction – a chronicle of the genesis of norms

  in: Robert Uerpmann-Wittzack (ed.): The New Fundamental Right to Computer Use, Berlin 2009, pp. 73–97.

• Unprotected sexual intercourse makes the front pages. Interview in: Juristische Arbeitsblätter 6 / 2009, pp. V–VI.
• No information on ongoing investigations. Editorial in: Juristische Arbeitsblätter 6 / 2009, p. I (Editorial).

• The 2008 Report on the Protection of the Constitution and Right-wing Extremism – A Sober Assessment

  www.blog.beck.de, 19 May 2009

• More crime due to leniency?

  www.blog.beck.de, 27 March 2009

• The School Shooting Publication Act – a proposal

  www.blog.beck.de, 20 March 2009

• The Hidden Realm of Morality. Interview in: Münchner Philtrat. Issue 7, January 2009, pp. 33–35.

• Governments as Criminal Conspiracies: The Case of Prisoner Abuse and Torture at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib

  in: Müller, Sander, Válková (eds.): Festschrift for Ulrich Eisenberg on his 70th birthday, Munich 2009, pp. 83–118. This publication is available online.

• Festschrift for Ulrich Eisenberg on his 70th birthday, Munich 2009. Edited jointly with Günther M. Sander and Helena Válková.
• “Lecture: ‘Child Pornography and the Internet – Basic Legal Conditions and De Facto Problems of Law Enforcement’”, June 2007 in Padua, Italy. Summary published in: Abstracts of the XXXth International Congress on Law and Mental Health, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2007.

• Indirect aiding and abetting by a defence lawyer in making a false statement under oath, commentary on the judgement of the Bamberg Higher Regional Court of 2 May 2006 – 2 Ss 73/05

  in: Strafverteidiger 2007, pp. 529–533.

• Aiding and abetting incitement or attempted incitement to make a false statement?

  in: JURA 2007, pp. 697–702.

• Commentary on the decision of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) of 11 July 2006 – 3 StR 216/06 (Decision on the standard practice of not administering an oath as a non-essential part of the main hearing in criminal cases)

  in: Juristische Rundschau 2007, pp. 79–81.

• Self-defence against threats

  in: Hoyer, Müller, Pawlik, Wolter (eds.): Festschrift for Friedrich-Christian Schroeder, Heidelberg 2006, pp. 323–337.

• Festschrift for Friedrich-Christian Schroeder on his 70th birthday, Heidelberg 2006. Edited in collaboration with Andreas Hoyer, Michael Pawlik and Jürgen Wolter.

• The Grey Area in Cases of Drink-Driving and Breath Alcohol Testing within the Framework of Section 24(1) of the German Road Traffic Act

  in: Prof. Dr Öztekin Tosun’a Armagan (ed.): Traffic and Criminal Law, Ankara 2006.
  Translated by Mehmet Cemil Ozansü

• Review of Dölling, Dieter et al. (eds.): Municipal Crime Prevention – Analyses and Perspectives from the Accompanying Research on the Pilot Projects in Baden-Württemberg

  in: Goltdammer’s Archive of Criminal Law 2005, pp. 489–552.
  in collaboration with Gabriele Klocke

• Commentary on the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) decision of 23 August 2004 – 3 StR 255/04 (Revision of the law on the administration of the oath)

  in: Juristische Rundschau 2005, pp. 78–81.

• Commentary on

  Sections 105–109k (offences against constitutional bodies and in connection with elections and referendums, and offences against national defence), Sections 153–163 (offences relating to testimony)

  in: Joecks, Miebach (eds.): Munich Commentary on the Criminal Code. Vol. 2, Munich, 2005.

• Note on the decision of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) of 3 March 2004 – 1 StR 71/04 (crediting of probationary performance, Section 31 of the Juvenile Court Act (JGG))

  in: Juristische Rundschau 2004, pp. 392–393.

• Commentary on the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) judgment of 4 March 2004 – 3 StR 218/03 (Motassadeq)

  in: Juristenzeitung 59 (2004), pp. 926–928.

• On the admissibility of a preventive action for an injunction – Commentary on the Thuringian Higher Regional Court, Jena, order of 3 February 2003 – 1Ws 380/02

  in: Zeitschrift für Strafvollzug und Straffälligenhilfe 53 (2004), pp. 53–55.

• On the criminology of video surveillance

  in: Roggan (ed.): Security or Freedom? The Fight against Terrorism and Concerns for the Liberal Constitutional State; Conference organised by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation/Forum Berlin in cooperation with the Humanist Union e.V. on 26 March 2003 in Berlin; Proceedings, pp. 71–81.

• Hit-and-run following a deliberate ramming by a police vehicle – Commentary on the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) judgement of 20 February 2003 – 4 StR 229/02 (Giessen Regional Court)

  in: Neue Zeitschrift für Verkehrsrecht 2003, pp. 559–561.
  together with Florian Kraus

• Legal guardians and the rule of law in juvenile criminal proceedings: an overview following the Federal Constitutional Court’s decision of 16 January 2003 – 2 BvR 716/01

  in: Juristische Arbeitsblätter 2003, pp. 892–899.
  in collaboration with Florian Kraus

• Commentary on the judgement of the Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe of 20 June 2002 – 3 Ss120/01 (Unsworn false testimony following failure to inform the witness of their right to remain silent)

  in: Strafverteidiger 2003, pp. 506 ff.

• What does ‘defence of the state’ mean in the German Criminal Code (StGB)?

  in: Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 2002, pp. 633–636.

• Overview of case law on offences relating to the administration of justice (1997–2001) – (Sections 153 et seq., 164, 258, 339, 356 of the German Criminal Code (StGB))

  in: Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 2002, pp. 356–364.

• Mathematics in the assessment of evidence in criminal proceedings

  in: Kühne, Jung, Kreuzer, Wolter (eds.): Festschrift für Klaus Rolinski, Baden-Baden 2002, pp. 219–238.

• On the Criminology of Video Surveillance

  in: Monthly Journal of Criminology and Criminal Law Reform 85 (2002), pp. 33–47.

• Review of Berghaus, Günter and Krüger, Hans-Peter (eds.): Cannabis in Road Traffic. 1998

  in: Blutalkohol 38 (2001), pp. 31–33.

• Commentary on the judgement of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) of 30 July 1999 – 1 StR 618/98 (Scientific requirements for psychological assessments of testimony [credibility assessments])

  in: Juristenzeitung 2000, pp. 267–268.

• False Testimony and the Doctrine of Complicity. Tübingen 2000 (Habilitation thesis, Free University of Berlin 2000).

• The unreported cases of drink-driving and breath alcohol testing under Section 24a(1) of the Road Traffic Act (StVG)

  in: Blutalkohol 36 (1999), pp. 313–328.

• Review of Laubenthal, Klaus: The Prison System. 2nd, updated edition 1998

  in: Jura 1999, p. 280.

• Report on a lecture given at an event organised by the Berlin Law Society. Prof. Dr H. J. Schneider: The current state and future trends of criminal policy on the threshold of the 21st century.

  in: Juristische Rundschau 1997, pp. 498–499.

• Commentary on the decision of the Regional Court of Hanover of 8 December 1995 – 52 StVK92/95 (On the question of a retrial in the event of a flawed exequatur order)

  in: Juristische Rundschau 1997, pp. 124–127.

• Contribution to the discussion on Frühwald, Stefan: Crime and Suicidal Tendencies

  in: Journal of Prison Services and Offender Support 45 (1996), p. 384.

• Decriminalisation through diversion?

  in: Young People in the Social Rule of Law. Towards a New Youth Courts Act. Proceedings of the 22nd German Youth Courts Conference 1992 in Regensburg, DVJJ e.V. (ed.), Bonn 1996, pp. 395–404.

• Diversion in Juvenile Criminal Law and Proceedings under the Rule of Law

  in: Deutsche Richterzeitung 1996, pp. 443–447.

• On self-defence in cases of blackmail

  in: *Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht* 1993, pp. 366–368.

• Statement of reasons as a condition of admissibility for an application for a court decision pursuant to Section 109 of the Prison Act

  in: Zeitschrift für Strafvollzug und Straffälligenhilfe 43 (1993), pp. 211–214.

• Official secrecy and the defendant’s defence arguments. Tübingen 1992 (PhD thesis, Free University of Berlin 1992)

• Assessments of the severity of offences according to Sellin and Wolfgang – a fabricated consensus?

  in: Monthly Journal of Criminology and Criminal Law Reform 74 (1991), pp. 290–299.

• Empirical evidence on ‘autonomous’ groups

  in: Multiple Offenders. Multiple Victims. Proceedings of the 21st Youth Court Conference in Göttingen, DVJJ e.V. (ed.) Hanover, 1990, pp. 120–125.

• Criminal Law Examination Essay: ‘Handover of Money on Video’

  in: Legal Training Courses 1990, pp. 120–125.
  together with U. Eisenberg

• Criminal Law Examination Essay: ‘Cheque Fraud’

  in: Juristische Arbeitsblätter 1989, pp. 160–165.
  in collaboration with U. Eisenberg

• Prison Law Examination Paper: ‘Set-off in the Prison System’

  in: Juristische Schulungen 1989, pp. 392–395.
  in collaboration with U. Eisenberg and B. Marhofer